Is autism an evolutionary experiment, or human interference?
I had a discussion near a young woman one evening about autism, its diverse levels, and other associated illnesses. There seem to be two schools of thought.
1. That autism is cause by chemical interference of society, contamination from products produced by us, (the human race) which causes anomalies contained by foetal development cause deficiencies within many social skills while enhancing one inimitable skill. I would consider this unlikely.
2. That autism may be a series of evolutionary experiments which develop unusually high capability on one area of the brain at the deficit of other attributes (predominantly social skills).
Answer: I would side near doctors who think toxins from vaccines approaching mercury and/or infections play a greater role in this condition ,along beside numerous other conditions.
i'm under the university of thought (along with a few friends it seems) that autism and cancer are both evolution at work.
Autism is an affect on the brain, indisputable area's excel while others do not.
Cancer is slightly different, cells mutate, cause them not to die, this spreads to other cells hence cancer. Only item is, one is mental and the other is physical, (and more deadly)
i can for some reason picture the adjectives going into a new age of homosapians and neiandertahlls, we'll hold the brains, (excelled brainpower, experemented by autsim)
vs extreme braun
(if a cell is damaged it commits suicide straight away, but what if the cell didn't slaughter itself? and the other cells faught the urge to liberate it, it forced itself to carry on working until it be actually limp even if that work were simply reproducing working cells)
Either way these are a short time ago my thoughts.
It is plain and simply a glitch in our genetic code, could enjoy been disorientation in the mother during a crucial time of year of fetal development, or mercury surrounded by the fish she ate, but these abnormal brain functions enjoy been since record history. Therefore I would just attribute it to modern science keeping more women from losing a pregnancy that quality would have allowed the body to slough bad or failure to flourish would hold caused the infant born to perish. But we see so much of it due to intervention. I am prone to opt for the latter. I believe the govermnet is trying o lessen the population by any means essential regardless if it is at the expense of out children.