How oodles culture know that acyclovir does not other work nor prevents the nouns of Herpes?

Why is it that no one promotes the safer treatment of L lysine for Herpes instead of the terrifying pharmaceuticals?
Is it all roughly speaking money or is this because people are unmindful like doctors?
L lysine is safer and more effectual along with promoting a well-mannered healthy diet large in antioxidants.

acyclovir
cause cancer and birth defects contained by unborn children L Lysine does not.

I use L-lysine when I get a mouth cold sore I begin getting them when I began smoking. They travel away really fast and since I quit smoking I do not obtain them as often except beneath stress.
Do any of you read the itty bitty information they write as warnings on these pharmaceuticals?

Answer:
While I approaching L-lysine, it also DOES NOT ALWAYS PREVENT TRANSMISSION OF HERPES.

Acyclovir has its place, and so does L-lysine.

An Italian study published within the New England Journal of Medicine in 2004 showed that sero-discordant couples (one poz, one neg) on valacyclovir (Valtrex) suppression analysis who used condoms consistently had magnificently low rates of infection in the previously cynical partner. It was somewhere close to 90+% prevention of infection. Not bleak at all. Not ideal, but better than nothing.

So let's not be slagging the meds so against the clock. Homeopathy plays a big role in condition, but so do pharmaceuticals.